- Senator Kajwang’ suggests Ruto’s judiciary criticism stems from frustrations with failed government policies
- Kajwang’ urges Ruto to follow constitutional provisions, not target judiciary for policy setbacks
- Senator Mungatana defends Ruto, claiming a call for a neutral conversation with the judiciary
Homa Bay Senator Moses Kajwang’ shared his perspective on President William Ruto’s ongoing criticism of the Judiciary, suggesting that it may stem from frustrations with government policies.
Homa Bay senator Moses Kajwang’ screengrab
Kajwang’ expressed his belief that Ruto is well aware of the proper procedures for introducing policies but has chosen to target the judiciary instead.
He emphasized the importance of maintaining a balance of power among the three arms of government for the rule of law, stating, “The balance of power between the three arms of government is what constitutes the rule of law and not rule by law.”
The senator urged Ruto to follow constitutional provisions if his desired changes are not implemented, cautioning against directing his frustrations toward the judiciary.
Kajwang’ argued, “Why would the president extend his frustrations to the Judiciary for the failure of government policies, yet the judiciary is saying for you to introduce public policy, there are certain procedural steps that you must go through.”
He also suggested that Ruto should focus on addressing other development challenges rather than blaming the judiciary for the nation’s current issues, stating, “I don’t think the courts are to blame for the Kenya shilling being 160 to the dollar today, or they are to blame for the mess in CBC. There are so many things the president can focus on.”
On the same show, Tana River Senator Danson Mungatana offered a contrasting view, defending President Ruto and arguing that he has been misinterpreted.
Mungatana asserted that Ruto is calling for a neutral conversation with the judiciary to streamline their mandates, stating, “That is not condemning the entire institution, that is not unconstitutional. What is wrong with having a conversation? And this conversation must be heard.”
Mungatana further defended Ruto against accusations of targeting the entire judiciary, asserting that Ruto’s remarks are directed at specific individuals who may have compromised their positions to hinder government policies.
“We have given them (Judiciary) a lot of power. We shouldn’t look at it negatively because the other end is no matter how difficult it is, people start improving institutions,” he added.
President Ruto has recently intensified his criticism of the Chief Justice Martha Koome-led judiciary, accusing it of sabotaging his government’s agenda. He has even declared his intention to disregard court orders that he perceives as motivated by ‘judicial impunity.’
This has led to a contentious exchange between the judiciary and the executive, with Chief Justice Koome faulting Ruto for his disregard ofFollow Us On Facebook and X For More News and Exclusives court orders.
